The defense lawyers filed a motion to declare the searches conducted by law enforcement officers in the prelacy illegal, because the archbishop or his representative was not present during them, the archbishop's lawyer was not allowed inside, the video recording was carried out by an unknown subject, and the seized computer was not packaged in the prescribed manner on site at the time of seizure. The court rejected the defense lawyers' motion to declare the evidence inadmissible without providing any solid reasons. Archbishop Michael's defense lawyers described the court's decision as illegal and biased.
2025-08-25
Telecast type: Լուր Ռեպորտաժ
